(4) |
Upon
determination by the Commission, based upon the standards set forth below and
after a hearing in which all interested parties have an opportunity to present
relevant evidence regarding such standards, that prices paid by firm retail
customers for natural gas in a specific delivery group are not constrained by
market forces and are significantly higher than such prices would be if they
were constrained by market forces, the Commission may impose directives as
described in subsection (2) of this Rule. For purposes of this subsection, the
Commission will utilize the following standards:
(a) |
Prices paid by firm retail customers for
natural gas in a specific delivery group shall be considered to be not
constrained by market forces if an emergency market failure results in
excessive market power. A market failure shall be deemed an emergency if
reasonably prudent firm retail customers are substantially harmed by the
resulting market power. To the extent that it finds such information relevant
in assessing if reasonably prudent firm retail customers can avoid being
substantially harmed, the Commission may consider barriers to customer
switching, the degree to which alternative choices do or may exist, and the
amount of information about alternative choices available to
consumers. |
(b) |
If the standard
established in (a) is met, the prices paid by the affected firm retail
customers for natural gas in a specific delivery group shall be considered
significantly higher than such prices would be if they were constrained by
market forces if:
1. |
Over the prior 12
months, such prices are more than 20% higher than such prices would be if they
were constrained by market forces; |
2. |
Over the prior 3 months, such prices are
more than 30% higher than such prices would be if they were constrained by
market forces; or |
3. |
The current
prices are more than 50% higher than such prices would be if they were
constrained by market forces. In determining what the prices would be if they
were constrained by market forces, the Commission shall consider the wholesale
price of natural gas, the cost of transportation, the costs of providing
marketer services, and the impact of specific retail pricing structures, e.g.,
fixed price contracts. The Commission may also consider, to the extent that it
finds such information relevant, the prices firm retail customers pay for
natural gas in other areas of the southeast, the prices firm retail customers
pay for natural gas in other states that have implemented retail competition,
and the historical spread between wholesale and retail prices. Additionally,
any such analysis may include the consideration of factors such as any
cross-subsidization that may exist, operating and other risk borne by Marketers
in competitive retail environments, and any other factors that affect the
Marketers' cost of providing service. |
|
|